On 25th March we held a Green Arts online meetup on the topic ‘Intersectional Justice in Climate Action’.
Thanks to the wonders of Zoom, we were able to enjoy a presentation from Ana T. Amorim-Maia, PhD Researcher at the Barcelona Lab for Urban Environmental Justice & Sustainability at Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB). Ana’s research focuses on climate change adaptation, climate justice, intersectionality, resilience and urban planning. Last year Ana presented about Intersectional Justice in Climate Adaptation at a workshop for Clyde Rebuilt. Amanda felt that this way of joining the dots between issues of equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) on the one hand, and climate action on the other, would be very useful for Green Arts members, particularly when working on EDI and environmental policies and planning.
Before Ana’s presentation, we read a provocation from an academic article*:
“Many artists and arts and culture initiatives working for a sustainable planet think that the ecological crisis is intertwined with other social and political problems, and when they take action for sustainability, they do so with the intent to create solutions for these problems as well. They think that living in a sustainable world is possible only if the issues of democratic deficit and inequality are resolved. Therefore, working on the climate crisis simultaneously denotes working on problems [of inequality].”
We took a poll on how we felt about this statement. 66% of us said we ‘strongly agreed’, while 33% ‘somewhat agreed’.
Ana’s presentation – summary
You can also watch this video of Ana’s talk HERE (15 min + 10 min of Q&A).
Climate impacts are experienced differently depending upon geographic, historical, social, political, economic and cultural settings. Inaction to reduce emissions will worsen climate impacts and increase (climate) injustices, especially for those already living with structural inequalities.
There is an uneven distribution of the benefits and burdens of climate impact and climate action. Climate action often takes the form of mitigation or adaptation, both of which can impact upon social inequality.
Climate action and social justice need to be considered alongside each other. For example, low-income, working class, and immigrant communities are faced with intersectional experiences of climate vulnerability and greater marginalisations, exclusions and injustices.
There is a danger of climate gentrification, when properties and areas previously seen as undesirable are adapted to face climate impacts, thereby pushing up value and prices. This further alienates and displaces vulnerable residents and creates ‘elite ghettos’ for the privileged.
Slide from Ana T. Maia-Amorim’s presentation
‘Intersectionality’ was coined by Professor Kimbleré Crenshaw in 1989 to describe how race, class, gender, and other individual characteristics ‘intersect’ with one another and overlap. Working with the concepts of intersectionality allows us a more diverse view of different lived experiences.
Intersectional justice in climate action helps move away from greening or low-carbon improvements that perpetuate or exacerbate vulnerabilities and encourages a multi-actor, multi-sector and multi-scale effort for climate justice.
Ana’s practical recommendations
- Recognise how intersecting social identities can create different modes of oppression and privilege and different ways of experiencing and dealing with climate change.
- Place the present and long-term needs of vulnerable people at the centre of our discussions and actions to avoid reproducing or worsening social and environmental inequalities.
- Recognise our privileges and use our voices, roles and networks to fight for intersectional justice in climate action.
Thank you to Kate Leiper for taking these notes on Ana’s presentation.
We returned to the quote we read earlier, and took another poll. This time, 100% of us said that we ‘strongly agreed’ with the statement that “working on the climate crisis simultaneously denotes working on problems [of inequality].” Ana’s talk was clearly very effective!
Participants moved into breakout rooms and considered the following questions:
Q1. How might some of your (organisation’s) carbon reduction measures or plans impact on people with differing abilities, gender or sexual orientation, employment status, different racial and socioeconomic backgrounds, or other characteristics in this triangle?
With the follow-up questions:
- How can you adapt your carbon reduction measures so they don’t exacerbate existing inequalities? Can you mitigate the negative impact?
- How can you help everyone make sustainable behavioural choices?
The situations imagined and discussed by the groups included:
If your organisation plans to reduce its carbon footprint by: choosing countries to work with which are close enough that collaborators can take the train rather than fly (which is much more carbon intensive)…
This would negatively impact on certain groups more than others because of : exclusion by geographical location. This might be particularly problematic if UK cultural organisations stop working much with organisations and artists in the Global South, as the UK needs to learn about their different experiences in order to respond to climate change in a just way. The impacts could be unequally felt because not everyone has adequate WiFi and digital infrastructure to participate in remote collaborations.
How could we mitigate this impact or offer alternatives? Organisations could set annual travel carbon budgets, and ringfence a portion of each year’s budget for working with collaborators in countries only accessible by air. When there is a festival or conference which requires a flight to attend, fewer people from Scotland could attend, but with a remit to share their learnings with other Scottish cultural organisations when they return, maybe at an event (to which people can travel overland!). This could prompt useful discussions and collaborative ways of building on the ideas generated at the international festival or conference.
You can see several further examples and ideas in this record of the breakout room discussion.
An overarching insight was that rather than try to offer a one size fits all solution for everyone who might be impacted by carbon reduction actions, we should open up conversations, talk with those who are affected, and work out appropriate ways to adapt our plans and policies, so that reducing carbon is an inclusive, collaborative effort.
Groups were then invited to consider a wider question:
Q2. How can the idea of intersectional climate justice be applied to cultural organisations’ wider work – environmental and beyond?
Some concrete examples were highlighted:
- Theatre Gu Leòr have written extra travel days into freelance creative staff contracts, enabling them to choose more sustainable but slower travel options. (Carbon Reduction)
- Theatre Gu Leòr also created a theatre work exploring how the climate crisis is particularly impacting on Gàidhlig speaking communities in coastal areas, who are losing both their land and their language as rising sea levels cause migration and dispersal. (Artistic)
- Julie’s Bicycle produce a podcast called ‘The Colour Green’, aiming to amplify the voices of artists of colour and of migrant origins, exploring links between climate change, race, nature and social justice. (Advocacy)
- Imaginate recruited a Board member to be their diversity champion and another to be their climate change champion, ensuring both viewpoints are represented at Board level. (Strategy, Governance)
Further ideas are included in the write-up of the breakout room exercises.
Some quick actions to take were suggested, including:
- Check out Creative Carbon Scotland’s Guide to Climate Justice
- Register to attend Culture Counts’ Culture Hustings (23rd April, 10-11:30am, online), where candidates for the Scottish Parliament elections will be asked questions from the cultural sector. Culture for Climate has contributed questions on how parties would value and support our sector as a key player in a just and green recovery.
- Sign up for the Global Just Recovery Gathering (9-11 April, online). “Hear from a powerful line-up of climate leaders, artists, and musicians in every corner of the world, and enjoy interactive workshops, cultural sessions, and hands-on trainings.” (The talks will be made available on the Global Just Recovery Gathering website after these dates.)
*The academic article from which the provocation was taken was a draft of ‘Transformation for a Sustainable Earth’ by Fazilet Mıstıkoğlu and colleagues at Istanbul Foundation for Culture and Arts.
The post Key Learnings from the Green Arts March Meetup: Intersectional Justice in Climate Action appeared first on Creative Carbon Scotland.
Creative Carbon Scotland is a partnership of arts organisations working to put culture at the heart of a sustainable Scotland. We believe cultural and creative organisations have a significant influencing power to help shape a sustainable Scotland for the 21st century.
In 2011 we worked with partners Festivals Edinburgh, the Federation of Scottish Threatre and Scottish Contemporary Art Network to support over thirty arts organisations to operate more sustainably.
We are now building on these achievements and working with over 70 cultural organisations across Scotland in various key areas including carbon management, behavioural change and advocacy for sustainable practice in the arts.
Our work with cultural organisations is the first step towards a wider change. Cultural organisations can influence public behaviour and attitudes about climate change through:
Changing their own behaviour;
Communicating with their audiences;
Engaging the public’s emotions, values and ideas.
Powered by WPeMatico