Chantal Bilodeau

Fire and Ice

By Susan Hoffman Fishman

In 2018, Timothy McDowell, artist and Professor of Studio Art at Connecticut College in New London, Connecticut, became involved in the on-going eco-art project, Extraction: Art on the Edge of the Abyss, founded by Edwin Dobb and Peter Koch. His commitment to the project and the environmental issues it addresses prompted him to develop and co-curate an exhibition called Fire and Ice with Connecticut College Professor Emeritus of Art History Barbara Zabel. Under the aegis of the Extraction project, Fire and Ice is currently on view through October 15, 2021 at the Cummings Art Center on the campus of Connecticut College.

Fire and Ice is one of 63 (to date) Extraction exhibitions, events, and publications that have occurred or will occur globally during 2021 and beyond “committed to shining a light on all forms of the extractive industry – from mining and drilling to the reckless plundering and exploitation of fresh water, fertile soil, timber, marine life, and innumerable other resources across the globe” as well as the damaging effects of the climate crisis. In addition to calling attention to the destruction of the planet’s natural resources, the Extraction project encourages artists to use the power of the arts, as Edwin Dobb proclaimed, to “destabilize the way extractive industry is portrayed and consumer culture promoted. We can hijack and reroute the conversation about what constitutes a good life in the opening decades of the 21st century. We can sound an alarm. We can raise a ruckus.”

The 17 artists participating in Fire and Ice have all heeded the call. Their media is as varied as the issues they address and includes video, soundscape, sculpture, painting, land art, drawing, installation, printmaking, and public art. The exhibition’s title is derived from Robert Frost’s renown poem of the same name, which curator Barbara Zabel believes “aptly articulates the focus of the exhibition: nature’s fragility in the face of untamed capitalist growth and climate crisis:”

Some say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I’ve tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice.

Gregory Bailey, Rain-Collecting Water Cistern, reclaimed steel, cones repurposed from old sculpture, garden hose, other recycled material, 94” x 116” x 62”, capacity 580 gallons, 2018.
Gregory Bailey, Mobile Pumping Unit, recycled material, 2021.

Gregory Bailey, sculptor, and Associate Professor of Sculpture at Connecticut College, has two pieces in Fire and IceMobil Pumping Unit and Rain-Collecting Water Cistern. Both reflect his determination to make art to promote a sustainable life by using upcycled materials that compensate for carbon usage and reduce consumption. Bailey createdRain-Collecting Water Cistern for the purpose of collecting water that he then used to grow trees. His intention was to significantly offset the carbon originally needed to make the sculpture with the carbon absorbed from the atmosphere over time by the trees he had grown.

Mobile Pumping Unit is Bailey’s personal response to the alarming increase of mega forestfires occurring throughout the world, and particularly in California where he was raised. Designed to protect his own property from fire when the climate crisis eventually creates the conditions in the Northeast conducive to large fires, the sculpture can pump water from his swimming pool using multiple hoses with branching lines to project water onto the flames. In winter, it can also be repurposed to pump water from his pool onto a nearby pond to create a smooth ice-skating surface. In a video he made for Fire and Ice, Bailey describes the development and functioning of Mobile Pumping Unit.

Nikki Lindt, Sketch 1, Tumbling Forests of the North, travel drawing 15, marker and acrylic pen on paper, part of sound installation piece, 6” x 9”, 2019.

Brooklyn-based visual and sound artist Nikki Lindt has spent the past four years studying how the climate crisis is impacting the permafrost in Northern Alaska. Permafrost Thaw Series, Tumbling Forests of the North – her multimedia project in the exhibition – consists of nine drawings made on-site in Alaska with marker and acrylic pen on paper, a diary of her explorations, and a soundscape recording of permafrost melting.

Several of Lindt’s drawings in the exhibition reveal “drunken forests,” areas where trees are growing in different directions, even horizontally, because the melting permafrost has caused ground instability. Sketch 1 (shown above) shows a large sink hole where despite the destruction caused by climate change, life is still pushing up from the earth. In all of these drawings, Lindt used bold strokes and brilliant colors to document significant environmental loss, creating a dynamic that forces the viewer to consider the dichotomy between the enormous power of the climate crisis to alter the Earth and the regenerative power of nature to heal itself.”       

Lindt’s video soundscape adds another dimension to her study of permafrost. The sound of crackling earth and dripping water was recorded in a Thermokarsk Failure, a hole in the ground created entirely by thawing permafrost. The recording provides a startling soundtrack to the consequences of the climate crisis.

Timothy McDowell, Daily Concerns, oil on wood panel, 48” x 48”, 2019.

After recent visits to a South American rain forest and to Iceland, Timothy McDowell was moved enough by what he had seen to refocus his artwork on conveying “our reckless exploitation of resources… current events regarding the environment, the causes of increased migration flows, and the insidious erosion of democratic values.” Although he says that the work he is creating now is much harder to sell than what he had created before, he sees it as his contribution to raising a ruckus.

Like all of the works in the exhibition, Daily Concerns, McDowell’s piece in Fire and Ice, is beautiful at first glance. Looking closer, you see flooding, a burned-out structure (perhaps from a mega forest fire), pollution spilling into a body of water, fumes, a mosquito (perhaps disease-carrying), combat figures, and pieces of a meteor descending to Earth. The skewed angles of the unknown structure, which make no logical sense, provide the overall impression that our world as we know is totally out of whack.

John Boone, Paradigm Shift (Series), 30” x 30” – 12” x 12”, acrylic on nine canvases, 2012.

Text artist John Boone makes paintings out of simple words, idioms, and colloquialisms in American English using a font that he designed himself. His nine canvases in Fire and Ice convey a sense of extreme urgency and the need to change one’s consciousness and behavior concerning the environmental crisis we are all facing. A.S.A.PSitting DuckParadigm Shift, Heads Up, and Sea Change are phrases that are instructional as well as provocative. These are the words along with all of the images, videos, recordings, and sculptures in Fire and Ice that should motivate us all to raise a stink before it is too late.  

Additional artists in the exhibition include Rachel B. Abrams, Nadav Assor, Chris Barnard, Zaria Forman, Michael Harvey, Emma Hoette, Wopo Holup, Pamela Longobardi, Robert Nugent, Lynda Nugent, Christopher Volpe, Amanda Wallace, and Andrea Wollensak. The opening reception for the exhibition [was] scheduled to take place on October 2, 2021 from 6:00-7:30 pm.

(Top image: Installation view of Fire and Ice at the Cummings Art Center, Connecticut College, New London, CT, 2021.)

This article is part of Imagining Water, a series on artists of all genres who are making the topic of water and climate disruption a focus of their work and on the growing number of exhibitions, performances, projects and publications that are appearing in museums, galleries and public spaces around the world with water as a theme.

______________________________

Susan Hoffman Fishman is a painter, public artist and writer whose work has been exhibited widely in museums and galleries throughout the U.S. Since 2011, all of her paintings, installations and photographs have addressed water and the climate crisis. Her most recent work, called In the Beginning There Was Only Water, is a visual re-creation of the world, a 40-panel re-imagining of the natural world without humanity’s harmful impact upon it. This fall, she will be participating in an artist’s residency at Planet, an international company providing global satellite images, where she will be comparing changes over time to bodies of water throughout the world.

———-

Artists and Climate Change is a blog that tracks artistic responses from all disciplines to the problem of climate change. It is both a study about what is being done, and a resource for anyone interested in the subject. Art has the power to reframe the conversation about our environmental crisis so it is inclusive, constructive, and conducive to action. Art can, and should, shape our values and behavior so we are better equipped to face the formidable challenge in front of us.

Go to the Artists and Climate Change Blog

Powered by WPeMatico

Wild Authors: Emma Reynolds

By Mary Woodbury

I was thrilled to talk with Emma Reynolds, author of the just-out children’s book Amara and the Bats, a beautifully written and illustrated story that reminds us of the determination of youth and the importance of bats. Emma Reynolds is an illustrator and author based in Manchester, UK. Her debut author-illustrator picture book Amara and the Bats is out July 20, 2021 with Atheneum – Simon & Schuster. Emma started the #KidLit4Climate illustrated campaign, bringing together over 3,000 children’s illustrators and authors from over 50 countries in solidarity with the youth climate strikes. She is inspired by nature, animals, adventure, and seeing the magic in the everyday.

You can order Amara and the Bats from Simon & Schuster. You can also follow Emma on TwitterInstagram, and her website, and subscribe to her newsletter.

Hi, Emma! Tell us about yourself – your life so far and how you got started in writing.

Hello! My name’s Emma, and I’m a children’s author and illustrator from Manchester, UK. I’ve always loved drawing and writing stories as far back as I can remember. When I was five, I would make my own books by stapling together square pieces of paper – I’ve been dreaming of making my own books since then.

I studied illustration at Uni and graduated into the recession, did a load of service and retail work, then after a few years as a character designer for kid’s TV I started to pursue my dream of being an author-illustrator. I spent my evenings and every other weekend working on my portfolio and creating a dummy book of Amara and the Bats – and this is the very book that got me my agent in 2018 and is going to be my author-illustrator debut. It feels so wonderful to have come this far.

Tell us something about your newest novel. Who is the intended audience, and what’s going on in the story?

Amara and the Bats is a picture book all about a little girl called Amara who LOVES bats, and when she moves house she is sad to find there are no bats in her local area. So, inspired by real life youth activists such as Tokata Iron Eyes and Greta Thunberg, she rallies her new friends and her community to save the bats. It’s all about bat conservation, community action, and hope!

Bat facts are weaved in throughout the story, and there are practical ways to help bats in the back too as well as useful links.

It is a picture book, so aimed towards children – but I could talk for hours about how picture books are for everyone of any age to enjoy, and for anyone who loves bats.

What got you interested in the wonderful world of bats?

I’ve always loved bats! I also used to have a pen with bats on – that was my first fountain pen, and I made this kit with my Mum when I was a kid, and put Velcro on the underside so they could hang under my bunk bed. Amara has a bat plushie in the book, and if you look carefully you can see the plushie hanging from her bed in the book as a special nod to my childhood.

What sorts of other ecological themes does your novel have?

It was inspired by creeping urbanization, rapid luxury flat development, and the destruction of the last green spaces in central Manchester. Amara and the Bats touches on the pressures of land being sold, and how this affects animals and nature through habitat fragmentation. On the positives, the book talks about the power of peaceful protest, rewilding, and how to make your garden or community green space bat friendly.

That’s interesting because a relative recently talked about making his yard bat-friendly, and we’ve been thinking of doing the same, so thank you! After publication, did you plan on doing any book fairs or talks? Is it hard to market during the pandemic?

I have indeed! I have a lot of things planned, both online and in person. I’ll keep my social media and website updated with these, and a great way to get all the news in one place is my newsletter.

I was at the Power of Words literary festival in Crowle, UK on Saturday, July 3, and I’ll be doing a Bat Conversation series over on my Instagram Live, with bat scientists and conservationists on Tuesdays at 6pm UK time, so keep an eye out for that as well.

COVID has been a challenge in more ways than one for sure – but I think the positive that has come out of adapting to online events is that more people can join from around the world, and disabled and chronically ill people have more access than ever before. I plan to keep on doing a combination of online and in person events going forward.

Are you working on anything else right now, and do you want to add other thoughts about your book?

I am! A very exciting project that I think you will like the theme of. It’s not been announced yet but I am very excited to talk about it when I can.

I hope that Amara will inspire a new generation of kids to get out into nature and enjoy our amazing bats!

Thanks so much, Emma. I’m so excited about your next project – and happy pub day!

This article is part of our Wild Authors series. It was originally published on Dragonfly.eco.

______________________________

Mary Woodbury, a graduate of Purdue University, runs Dragonfly.eco, a site that explores ecology in literature, including works about climate change. She writes fiction under pen name Clara Hume. Her novel Back to the Garden has been discussed in Dissent Magazine, Ethnobiology for the Future: Linking Cultural and Ecological Diversity (University of Arizona Press), and Uncertainty and the Philosophy of Climate Change (Routledge). Mary lives in Nova Scotia and enjoys hiking, writing, and reading.

———-

Artists and Climate Change is a blog that tracks artistic responses from all disciplines to the problem of climate change. It is both a study about what is being done, and a resource for anyone interested in the subject. Art has the power to reframe the conversation about our environmental crisis so it is inclusive, constructive, and conducive to action. Art can, and should, shape our values and behavior so we are better equipped to face the formidable challenge in front of us.

Go to the Artists and Climate Change Blog

Powered by WPeMatico

Coping with Climate Despair in Four Steps

By Jennifer Atkinson

With the urgency of our climate crisis increasing by the day, many scientists and climate leaders are calling for global action on the scale of World-War II mobilization: a swift and comprehensive overhaul of our existing consumer economy and the energy systems driving us off a cliff. And yet as the planetary fires close in, many people remain paralyzed by fear, hopelessness or cynicism.

Luckily, there are steps we can all take to overcome despair and start contributing to solutions. This episode outlines 4 basic strategies to beat the climate blues and become an agent of change.

(Top image by Appolinary Kalashnikova via Unsplash.)

Facing It is a podcast about climate grief and eco anxiety. It explores the psychological toll of climate change, and why our emotional responses are key to addressing this existential threat. In each episode of Facing It, I explore a different way we can harness despair to activate meaningful solutions.

______________________________

Dr. Jennifer Atkinson is an Associate Professor of environmental humanities at the University of Washington, Bothell. Her seminars on Eco-Grief & Climate Anxiety have been featured in the New York TimesWashington Post Magazine, the Los Angeles TimesNBC News, the Seattle Times, Grist, the Washington PostKUOW and many other outlets. Jennifer is currently working on a book titled An Existential Toolkit for the Climate Crisis (co-edited with Sarah Jaquette Ray) that offers strategies to help young people navigate the emotional toll of climate breakdown.

———-

Artists and Climate Change is a blog that tracks artistic responses from all disciplines to the problem of climate change. It is both a study about what is being done, and a resource for anyone interested in the subject. Art has the power to reframe the conversation about our environmental crisis so it is inclusive, constructive, and conducive to action. Art can, and should, shape our values and behavior so we are better equipped to face the formidable challenge in front of us.

Go to the Artists and Climate Change Blog

Powered by WPeMatico

Wild Authors: Venetia Welby

By Mary Woodbury

I had the wonderful opportunity to connect with author Venetia Welby late last year and learn about her novel Dreamtime (Salt Publishing, September 2021). Signed copies are available from UK bookshop Burley Fisher here, and here is the Amazon UK link.

I’ll admit to being distracted these days when trying to focus on a book. COVID and climate catastrophes are worrisome without clear and consistent leadership. We read about eco-grief a lot these days, and it’s real. But Venetia’s Dreamtime blew me away and kept me hooked. For that, I’m forever grateful. Seems like a good book is sometimes enough to keep me going.

This world spotlight travels to Japan with Dreamtime.

About the Book

From the publisher:

The world may be on a precipice but Sol, fresh from Tucson-desert rehab, finally has an answer to the question that has dogged her since childhood. And not a moment too soon. With aviation grinding to a halt in the face of global climate meltdown, this is the last chance to connect with her absentee father, a US marine stationed in Okinawa. To mend their broken past, Sol and her lovelorn friend Kit must journey across poisoned oceans to the furthest reaches of the Japanese archipelago, a place where sea, sky, and earth converge at the forefront of an encroaching environmental and geopolitical catastrophe; a place battered by the relentless tides of history, haunted by the ghosts of its past, where the real and the virtual, the dreamed and the lived, are ever harder to define. In Dreamtime, Venetia Welby paints a terrifying and captivating vision of our near future and takes us on a vertiginous odyssey into the unknown.

My immediate thoughts were as follows: The novel is brilliantly complex, emotional, and frightening. Venetia’s writing gets deep and challenges the reader to think about consequences of our way of life.

The story takes place in the future and follows a woman named Sol and her best friend Kit, who have grown up in a cult in Arizona. A lot of the complexity of the novel is due to humans unable to truly embrace reality in all its dimensions, including how the history of humans has changed the physical, cultural, and emotional landscape of the world through conquest, ecological ruin, killings, torture, climate ruin, and so much more.

How do humans live in such a world without some utopian climate-controlled cult where drugs and sex help one to forget? And that’s how the story begins. But Sol’s estranged mother comes to her to let her know about her real father, that he’s alive, in Japan – a missing puzzle piece that has haunted Sol forever. Because of climate catastrophe, planes are soon being outlawed, and she and Kit catch one of the last planes to Japan.

The crazy, raw descriptions of Japan are miraculously beautiful at times, full of Japanese myth and animal spirits, yet also horribly accurate and impactful when exploring the aftermath of America’s history of dumping waste and using the islands from WWII onward – and now the islands are sinking due to rising seas. There are no safe places.

Venetia propels us into a haunted world of the future, to lost worlds and oneiric places, which are in ruin, screaming of the past, present, and a questionable future. Ghosts, memories, mutations, and consequences filter into the present. Disease and pollution make the world a place where the only way to forget is to get inebriated somehow, but to truly rise above might just mean facing harsh truths, strengthening one’s will and spirit, and finding love.

The inclusion of love and care made the novel sing and transitioned the most ominous dystopia into something that might have a chance. Some of the best fiction about our natural world involves humans who inspire us and give us courage as we chart the path ahead.

A Chat with the Author

I was completely immersed in Dreamtime, but, first, can you tell us something about your previous book and the experiences that led you to write such a novel?

I’m thrilled to hear that! Thank you. My first novel Mother of Darkness was set closer to home in Soho, a wonderful part of London with a long, rackety history that’s being destroyed by luxury apartment developers and retail chains. It tells the story of the fragmenting mind – through a splintered story – of Matty, a young man in crisis who tries to run from his past and reinvent himself, with limited success. I’ve always been interested in madness and when I studied Classics, it was always the tales of insanity and early psychology that most fascinated me. I also knew a few people who, like my dubious hero, were converted hedonists, the energy trammelled into new, extreme religious stances, and I shared a flat with a psychiatrist friend. The upshot of all this was that I spent a lot of time thinking about the link between madness and epiphany, the internal experience of drifting from reality, and the Jungian archetype of the puer aeternus, the boy who will not grow up, with its links to mother and messiah complexes. I also really love old Soho and wanted to capture its filthy fading glory before it vanished entirely. As in Dreamtime there are themes of disappearing culture and the climate crisis, which is the spark that ignites Matty’s delusions of saviorhood.

Your novel Dreamtime is a story taking place mostly in Japan. When you actually traveled there, how long did you stay, what was it like, and what about Japan’s natural landscapes and history inspired Dreamtime?

Dreamtime is about two Americans, Sol and Kit, who travel to Japan to search for Sol’s GI father before a worldwide aviation ban descends. As the greatest concentration of Americans is on the island of Okinawa, this is the conflicted area I wanted to investigate. My trips have focused almost entirely on Okinawa and the other Ryukyu Islands, rather than the more familiar, contrasting mainland Japan, which colonised the Ryukyu Kingdom in 1879. I stayed a month, initially, and after a short wild burst of Tokyo overstimulation, I explored Okinawa, Ishigaki and Iriomote, subtropical islands of devastating natural beauty. The sea is alive, an extraordinary turquoise; the coral sand a pristine white; the Iriomote jungle hiding the only lynx of its kind, coconut crabs that can crush a skull, dugong in the water. When I returned a year later, I stayed solely on Okinawa: in the capital Naha, in the American Village where the military bases are densest, and in Yomitan, a more rural region. This was meant to be a shorter trip, but Typhoon Trami came along, my flights were cancelled and I had to stay put while the eye of the storm passed directly over. This was exciting, terrifying and ultimately quite boring, trapped in a room with no power for days – particularly noticeable there, where even the lavatories are electric.

Okinawa is different: different culture, religion, language, food – different indigenous people, who have suffered unspeakably under Japanese rule, rolled out on the front line of WW2 to protect Japan in a battle that killed a third of the island’s civilian population. The island was in ruins, Okinawans herded into unsanitary camps, and when the Americans released them they discovered that roads and bases had been built over their bulldozed houses, schools and graves. The American Occupation turned beautiful Okinawa into ‘the Keystone of the Pacific’, GIs seizing more land at gunpoint, building forty bases on this little coral island to stockpile nuclear and chemical weapons and fight their wars. Okinawa was sold back to Japan, but Tokyo betrayed them again and allowed the American bases to remain. The military has committed a litany of violent crimes against the Okinawan people, unleashed untold pollution – see Jon Mitchell’s brilliant Poisoning the Pacific for more on this – and exhibited a complete disregard for what the locals want on their islands. So Okinawa’s landscape is conflicted: astounding nature carved up by highways, barbed wire and military equipment, the sky roaring with Ospreys and fighter jets, the jungle ripped up by training camps and firing ranges. What drew me to the story of Dreamtime is this essential conflict – Okinawa’s troubled, persecuted soul, oppressed by Japanese law and American military culture. Its islands are split three ways.

I really loved the depth of the characters: Sol, Kit, Phoenix, Hunter, and all the rest. It’s honestly refreshing and amazing for a story about humanity and human relationships to include the state of nature around them, but also for the people’s story to be so raw, honest, longing, redemptive. Similarly, the plot was an immersive piece of storytelling. How did you come up with these people, this story?

Sol, as many of my characters and stories seem to do, came out of a place I’d been: one of my tutees was in rehab in Arizona and I stayed in the desert nearby, teaching her English and philosophy. Sol bears no resemblance to anyone I met there but my surroundings conjured her. Having explored Freudian mother issues in Mother of Darkness, I was drawn to father issues this time – Sol has something of an Electra complex and this, combined with her errant father and an impulsive, addictive nature leads the plot as much as the wider ideas of climate breakdown, the end of aviation and war with China. Sol is determined to find him, whatever the cost. Similarly, her lovelorn friend Kit can’t act other than to follow Sol, try to protect her, given his character, their history. Hunter, a marine, was more difficult to pin down, more mercurial in conception and in execution, and Phoenix, the abusive cult leader of Sol and Kit’s childhood, hovers over the whole book, his legacy inescapable, yet he is directly referred to only a handful of times.

The books I love are character-centric, no matter how elaborate the plot. The Sheltering Sky by Paul Bowles and The Beach by Alex Garland were big influences on Dreamtime. Each has an extraordinary storyline, but it was the knotty, inscrutable characters who hooked me in and kept me in their world long after reading. There’s truth and depth in folklore and fairy tale too, and I drew on these to explore the trickster archetype across eastern and western mythology, there on an island where the cultures clash so cruelly. The story of Okinawa’s future emerges directly from its past, how it has been treated – and continues to be – by Japan and America, how issues with North Korea and China serve to justify further development of US military might there, and how islands of the Pacific at the mercy of their colonial overlords will suffer as the climate emergency progresses and migration is policed. In Dreamtime, I wanted to consider the end of aviation not as an attempt to curb climate change – but as a nationalistic government’s bid to win favor by slowing climate migration. Keep the good land for themselves while the sea swallows up the bad.

I want to mention utopia and dystopia. I always fall back on Ursula K. Le Guin’s thoughts:

“Good citizens of utopia consider the wilderness dangerous, hostile, unlivable; to an adventurous or rebellious dystopian it represents change and freedom. In this I see examples of the intermutability of the yang and yin: the dark mysterious wilderness surrounding a bright, safe place, the Bad Places – which then become the Good Place, the bright, open future surrounding a dark, closed prison . . . Or vice versa.”

Your novel really brought this home because the cult described at the beginning may have been a utopian place, whereas outside of it appears dystopian (i.e., nature’s wrath/danger), but outside does really represent freedom. What do you think?

I love this piece by Le Guin, and certainly Sol views the desert rehab Lights, where the novel begins, as a suffocating prison. Lights exists within a glass dome, even the air tightly controlled, since the temperature of the Sonoran Desert is now unliveable. The wilderness is dangerous, patrolled by what wildlife can survive the sun, waiting to commit violence against those who leave the clinical confines. Dreamtime, the cult where Sol and Kit grew up, was rather wilder than rehab, within – yet mostly safe from – the savagery of the desert, deemed utopia by a disturbed few. Things happen in these cut-off spaces. Sacrifices of humanity can be made, unobserved by the outside world. Sometimes such sacrifices must be made, to preserve their cut-offness. Once an inmate is free in nature, the inherent vice of utopia may be seen more clearly. There is risk in freedom, the sea, the desert – but liberty is worth it. Surely a prerequisite of true utopia should be living in harmony with the planet you’re on? Although they do that in The Beach and it doesn’t turn out brilliantly… And what happens when nature is no longer conducive to human life? At that point, it’s probably best to scuttle into an imperfectly utopian hole – a cave maybe – and hide.

At the start of the novel, there’s a sense of virtual reality, including the cult that Kit and Sol were raised in being a place where control, authority, lies, and ways of virtual escape (drugs, for instance) keep people from dealing with truth. Such a concept is increasingly prevalent around the world, like for instance in America where QAnon is growing. How does this happen?

In the novel, it seems our ongoing disruptions that cause climate catastrophe and loss of landscape, culture, and lives might be just too hard for humans to deal rationally with. I was particularly drawn to this line: “People have largely stopped acknowledging the quiet death sentence upon them. They have come to accept inertia and stasis in the face of climatic catastrophe and the invading seas.” And this line about what might be the seduction of escape from reality:  “’It’s real and it’s not real,’ he used to say. ‘It’s not just in your mind but a place created by all minds over all time.’” What are your thoughts on that?

Yes, I think it’s really worrying – but psychologically plausible. The truth is too painful. It’s hard to face our own mortality, let alone that of the planet, the human race. It feels too big: people don’t believe they can make a difference or persuade the big polluters to do so. It’s easier to live in denial and it’s in the interest of avarice to facilitate that denial. In Dreamtime, the same tycoon owns the news and Virrea, a virtual reality company with devices as prevalent as smartphones. Virrea’s obscuring of the truth is itself justified by the climate catastrophe: if people shouldn’t travel, VR provides an alternative. Its version of the news is now all people know – and they’re happier that way. VR is used as a tool for manipulation, for covering the government’s tracks and for one powerful nation to control the international narrative. The plight of the vulnerable, the dealings of the military abroad: it can all slip under the radar.

I do think escape is seductive. It’s innate to seek it however we can – alcohol, drugs, religion. Human brains want us to be happy: they direct us away from pain and towards pleasure. The last line you quoted refers to the spiritual teachings of cult-leader Phoenix, pillaged from his experience in the Australian outback. His commune Dreamtime is named after Aboriginal cosmology, in particular the belief in a time out of time where the great spirit ancestors of the creation may still be found – an eternal present and neverwhen. This dimension, confused with the Jungian collective unconscious, is what Phoenix’s followers seek to access through ritual and peyote. Real life is hard! Coming to terms with the idea that we’re causing the only life-supporting planet we know of to become uninhabitable is even harder. Knowledge is brutal, changing our ways uncomfortable. Both are vital.

I kept going back to this line, “In the Golden Age, gods and monsters lived alongside men. Then we all moved into cities. We banished the mythical creatures and ghosts with our bright lights and civilisation.” How do you think environmental and cultural destruction go hand in hand with building cities, settling down? It reminds me of Daniel Quinn’s novels, which greatly informed me at a younger age.

Well, it’s worth pointing out that Phoenix, who says this in one of his sermons, is a deranged criminal – but I think he had a point here. Out of sight, out of mind. We lose touch with nature almost entirely in cities – even the parks are humanised, sterilised, only diverse enough for pigeons, rats and the odd grey squirrel. Cities have their own microclimates: heating in the cold, air con in the heat; greater heat caused by the air con units, more air con units then needed. We control the weather in our own environment in cities and we do so in the country too. I went to Dubai once and when inside, was completely unable to tell what it was like outside. To go anywhere meant taking the lift down to the underground carpark, then driving to another underground carpark, then up in the lift of another weather-defying apartment or hotel or mall. Walking wasn’t possible, there was no contact at all with nature: even the beach was accessed through miles of concrete shopping centre. Is that the future? I hope not, but it was certainly inspiration for Sol’s glass-dome rehab.

Ghosts exist in the shadowlands; mythical creatures dwell on the borders, in the thin places – part of our collective psyche but increasingly lost to us. I’ve not read any Daniel Quinn yet, but have just bought Ishmael and feel it might change my life.

Can you explain your thoughts about inundating the story with ghosts, myths, and animal spirits? I enjoyed these, from krakens to whales to shapeshifting foxes. I think they lent a lot to the story, a layer that is critical, as I think we need more stories inclusive of our natural surroundings, including our narratives and myths about nature.

In Japan, and particularly in Okinawa, the spirit world is thought to be present in every-day reality. It is part of life – and Japanese fiction reflects this. In my opinion, nothing conveys a place better than the strange folkloric creatures that emerge from it, but in Dreamtime they are not simply atmospheric but actors in the story. They mirror the disturbance and chaos of the real world – the tricksters of the West invade the East; the beasts of Japan do not belong in the Ryukyu Islands. Rape, plunder, and deceit has battered this part of the world into its current state, and the mythological melting pot enacts its disturbance.

The thawing permafrost of the Siberian tundra had been playing a lot on my mind – the emergence of ancient life – unknown viruses, bacteria and god knows what else. I’d been preoccupied with the idea of humans going where they shouldn’t – mining the deep sea, mining the moon – and stirring shit up. I wondered what other ancient mysteries they might unearth in these places, as if the very creatures of our collective unconscious could be disturbed and made visible. I also wanted to explore the idea that climate change is taking us into a new era, more akin to the sweltering jungle world the dinosaurs knew. Some can survive here. Some can adapt to thrive on the heat and perhaps the poison too. Not us, obviously, and not the myriad animals already fighting extinction. Stranger, more alien beasts.

Related to the above, I was particularly moved by the old Umitu’s stories. She says, “Our island is built on sadness, terror and loss. Like so many islands in the Pacific: peaceful people living in harmony with the land of their ancestors, the spirits of animals, the sea … replaced by barbed wire, pollution and violence. Life swapped for death.” I found these descriptions naturally placed, a part of the story, perhaps a lyrical polemic but not didactic. Because ecologically aware fiction, which includes the recognition of climate change, is growing, how important is that aspect to you – and how do you think new authors dealing with this can write stories that are stories, not sermons?

I want people to be aware of the horrors that happened and continue to happen in Okinawa, and to imagine this future for the world if business continues as normal: an earth so poisoned, its immune response is to reject humans and all their creation. But I’m glad you don’t think it’s didactic. It is crucial that stories are allowed to be stories, not vessels for preaching or propaganda. We have Twitter for that. I think having a diversity of characters in a story is key to navigating an issue, and rejecting the idea of ‘the single story’ as Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie brilliantly puts it: “When we reject the single story, when we realize that there is never a single story about any place, we regain a kind of paradise.” So too, there is no single story for a character; no one is exclusively this thing or that, good or bad. Novels are powerful; they can effect change. But I don’t think that should be the focus of writing one. The power of a story is in its story-ness.

Are you working on anything else yet?

Yes, I’m filling notebooks, circling an idea – zoning in, yet imagining my characters further and further away, literally as far as they can reasonably go given current technology. I feel this must be a symptom of London’s never-ending lockdown. Perhaps when it lifts, I’ll be able to bring them closer to home again. Back to Okinawa would be good – I’d love to let my mind live there for another novel.

Thanks so very much for this in-depth interview, and I am looking forward to whatever is next!

This article is part of our Wild Authors series. It was originally published on Dragonfly.eco.

______________________________

Mary Woodbury, a graduate of Purdue University, runs Dragonfly.eco, a site that explores ecology in literature, including works about climate change. She writes fiction under pen name Clara Hume. Her novel Back to the Garden has been discussed in Dissent Magazine, Ethnobiology for the Future: Linking Cultural and Ecological Diversity (University of Arizona Press), and Uncertainty and the Philosophy of Climate Change (Routledge). Mary lives in Nova Scotia and enjoys hiking, writing, and reading.

———-

Artists and Climate Change is a blog that tracks artistic responses from all disciplines to the problem of climate change. It is both a study about what is being done, and a resource for anyone interested in the subject. Art has the power to reframe the conversation about our environmental crisis so it is inclusive, constructive, and conducive to action. Art can, and should, shape our values and behavior so we are better equipped to face the formidable challenge in front of us.

Go to the Artists and Climate Change Blog

Powered by WPeMatico

Elena Soterakis: Not a Drop to Drink

By Etty Yaniv

Elena Soterakis is an artist and curator who has been exploring the intersection between art and science throughout her entire artistic practice. Today, she shares some background on BioBAT Art Space, her upcoming curatorial project with Jeannine Bardo, as well as some insight on her own artwork.

You are both a prolific artist and a curator. Let’s start with your latest curatorial project. Tell me about the genesis and vision for BioBat Art Space, which launched on January 4, 2019.

I’m fascinated by the connection between art and science. Thankfully, when Kathleen Otto and Eva Kramer of BioBAT, a not-for-profit lab space located in the Brooklyn Army Terminal in New York City, set out to create a new Sci/Art space in their ground floor lobby, they were community-oriented and wanted to bring in South Brooklyn artists like myself and Jeannine Bardo. Because Jeannine has successfully brought dynamic, high-quality programming to the underserved arts community of Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, through the Stand4 Gallery, BioBAT approached her for the project. Jeannine was enthusiastic about this opportunity but felt conflicted about taking on another project when she already runs a gallery space and has a thriving studio practice. She didn’t think there were enough hours in the day, and that is when Jeannine reached out to me to get involved. Jeannine and I are curatorially aligned because we believe the intersection of science and art can solve the problems of tomorrow.

The idea of launching a new art space in the Brooklyn Army Terminal seemed like it had a tremendous amount of potential, and I wanted to be involved. I was already excited about the project, but when Jeannine took me to see the space, I was blown away. The space is beautiful. It’s enormous with high ceilings and views of the water, and it’s only a few hundred feet from the ferry. Eva and Kathleen even had two prominent architects design the gallery during BioBAT’s initial construction.

Tarah Rhoda, Ourglass, 10″ x 10″ x 73″, spinach, ethanol, IV bag, volumetric flask, syringe, ultraviolet light, 2017. Photo by Scott McCullough.

Tell me a bit about the artists in this show.

In “Spontaneous Emergence of Order,” we featured four interdisciplinary artists who approach their studio practices like scientists; their works connect us all to the natural world and our place in it: Tarah Rhoda, Tanya Chaly, Magdalena Dukiewicz, and Richelle Gribble.

Tarah Rhoda’s work explores the body as a reflection of the natural world, echoing the landscapes, weather patterns, and biological processes that result in various minerals. She often uses laboratory practices to approach her own body as an archaeological site, “mining” her own tears or freckles to create profound pieces that cause us to reflect on our relationship with nature. Tarah also manages the SVA Bio Art Lab.

Tanya Chaly explores how natural history, wilderness, and the natural world are presented and recorded. Tanya makes research trips and gathers materials from the natural environment, as well as conducting field research face-to-face with scientists. Her work renders the invisible forces that shape our world, making it possible to re-imagine what we perceive of the natural order.

Magdalena Dukiewicz’s practice deconstructs and decontextualizes hydrolyzed animal collagen and blood, turning these substances into refined pieces of art. As the piece itself disintegrates and transforms, it evokes the natural life cycle. The ephemeral nature of her work illuminates the underlying themes: time, transformation, memory, identity, and death.

Richelle Gribble explores the interdependence of life at all levels of living systems – organisms, social systems, and ecosystems. Her work reveals the striking similarities between the structural patterns that occur in our social, biological, and technological networks, blurring our world into one integrated system. Richelle poses an important question: how does connectivity, for better or for worse, influence our lives and our future?

Tanya Chaly, Cascade-Index, 80″ x 120″ overall, graphite and pigment, punctured drawing on parchment under convex glass and plexi glass domes, linen book binding thread, dissection pins, 2017. Photo by Nicholas Knight Studio.

Your own work and curatorial projects show a strong interest in science and the environment. Can you talk a bit about how that informs your art, both making and curating?

Both scientists and artists try to make sense of the world we live in. With my art, I attempt to get to the bottom of human irrationality and what drives us to destroy the planet we live on. My work explores themes of disposability and impending ecological disaster. My curatorial practice attempts to answer the same questions through other works that are very much aligned with the same themes.

Magdalena Dukiewicz, Flesh and Blood, 45″ x 17″ x 8″, blood and hydrolyzed collagen with air bubbles, 2018. Photo by Jung Hee Mun.

Tell me about “Urban Geometry.”

“Urban Geometry” was a series I completed before introducing collage into my work, and began addressing environmental issues. These paintings are a hybrid of plein air studies and photo references. I enjoyed painting cityscapes of Brooklyn and Queens because I was drawn to the math and geometry of the scenes. This series specifically was a turning point in my practice; during that period, I felt I wasn’t participating in a dialogue about the 21st Century Landscape or contemporary issues. Whenever I hit a wall in my studio practice, I introduce a new material, so I started experimenting with collage. This immediately brought to mind waste, and landed itself to more ecologically-minded scenes.

Richelle Gribble, Community Web, 120″ x 120″, found and donated rope, fabric, string, yarn, cords, and plastic, 2016. Photo courtesy of Jonathan Ferrara Gallery.

For the “Re-Animator” exhibition, curated by John Avelluto, you created three pieces that converse with the aesthetics of the Hudson River School. What was your idea behind this project and what was your take away?

The theme of the “Re-Animator” exhibition was to take an existing work of art and re-fashion it into something new. I created a triptych, called “Lake George Revisited”, in which I quote a painting from the Hudson River painter, Martin Johnson Heade. The original Lake George painting was completed in the 1860s, and I turned it into three different 21st century scenes of degradation. It’s a startling juxtaposition to see such beautiful nature next to human waste. I’m drawn to romantic landscape artists of the 19th century, but I’ve found there’s a dissonance in painting romantic landscapes during the 21st century, when we are facing ecological ruin.

Elena Soterakis, Martin Johnson Heade’s Lake George Revisited 1862 (triptych), 10″ x 20“, digital print with oil and collage, 2016.

You seem to be drawn to landscape painting. How do you see your work in this context?

I’ve always been a landscape painter, and while the content of my work has changed, I still consider myself as such. Even at the New York Academy of Art, which had a strong emphasis on the human figure, I was primarily painting landscapes. Two main influences in my work are Edward Hopper and Anslem Keifer.

In your more recent body of work, Ecocide, you allude to environmental concerns. What are your thoughts on the balancing act between art and an underlying social/political “message”?

For my work, I think it’s important that the art be able to stand alone on its own aesthetic merit, despite any underlying political/social message. First and foremost, I seek to create compelling, emotive imagery that engages the viewer, while at the same time opening a dialogue about the issues of our time.

What can you share about your current work at the studio?

Currently, I’m working on a collaborative project with artist Eric DicksonThe Museum of Supposedly Valueless Things, a fictional museum that is curated from the perspective of someone in the future who cannot comprehend our own society’s wasteful ways. We look forward to sharing our work with a larger audience and have plans to exhibit the show in spring of 2019.

Elena Soterakis at NARS / J&M open studio, fall 2018. Photo by Salim Hasbini.

(Top image: Elena Soterakis, Not a Drop to Drink, 18′ x 24′, oil, molding paste, and collage on panel, 2017. Photo by Scott Rosenberg.)

This interview is part of a content collaboration between Art Spiel and Artists & Climate Change. It was originally published on Art Spiel on January 2, 2019 as part of an ongoing interview series with contemporary artists.

______________________________

Etty Yaniv works on her art, art writing, and curatorial projects in Brooklyn. She has exhibited her immersive installations in museums and galleries, nationally and internationally. Yaniv founded the platform Art Spiel to highlight the work of contemporary artists through art reviews, studio visits, and interviews with artists, curators, and gallerists. Yaniv holds a BA in Psychology and English Literature from Tel Aviv University, a BFA from Parsons School of Design, and an MFA from SUNY Purchase.

———-

Artists and Climate Change is a blog that tracks artistic responses from all disciplines to the problem of climate change. It is both a study about what is being done, and a resource for anyone interested in the subject. Art has the power to reframe the conversation about our environmental crisis so it is inclusive, constructive, and conducive to action. Art can, and should, shape our values and behavior so we are better equipped to face the formidable challenge in front of us.

Go to the Artists and Climate Change Blog

Powered by WPeMatico

Katrina Bello: Non-Human Expressivity

By Etty Yaniv

New Jersey- and Manilla-based artist Katrina Bello draws on memories of her childhood in the Philippines for her work. Ranging from small to large scales, her drawings depict geological layers as vast fields of textures and colors, alluring us to sense the awe in vastness while also inviting us to get close and sense the fragility and tenderness in each detail.

You were born in Davao City in the Philippines and you are currently working in New Jersey and Metro Manila in the Philippines. Tell me about your background and what brought you to drawing. Why drawing?

The memories and experiences of the natural environments of my childhood home in Davao City in the Philippines are what propelled me to start making the kind and size of drawings that I have been making recently. Davao City is located in the southern island of Mindanao in the Philippines. It is a coastal city that also has dormant volcano Mt. Apo, and so the beaches on the coast near the foot of the volcano have fine black sand. The black sand made the sea appear opaque, dense, and unfathomable.

We lived near that beach; it was a place my family visited almost every weekend. Mine was a childhood spent with an incredible amount of freedom to explore the seashore’s natural features. We also had farms where we kept farm animals and grew vegetables – places that were considered our playgrounds. But it was in this black sand seashore environment that my siblings and I felt the greatest sense of freedom, fright, daring, exploration, and curiosity. Perhaps there was something in the darkness of the sand and sea that fueled our imaginations. We were aware of the life that lived in those opaque depths, but in the absence of seawater transparency, we had to imagine what it looked like. My brothers and I would make vivid drawings with crayons of that unseen underwater life. Interestingly, I cannot recall us using any blacks, grays, or tones resembling the color of the dark sand and opaque water. Our drawings were colorful.

In the studio in Newark, New Jersey, 2018.

I keep a vial of this black sand with me. The sand is dry and has a cool gray color. Only when wet does it turn black. This black sand – the memories it evokes, the landscape it is from, its ties to a homeland that I cherish – is perhaps the reason why drawing has become my current medium. With the use of charcoal, graphite, and gray-toned pastels, every drawing that I make feels like a recreation of this landscape. And as for choosing drawing as my primary medium, there is something in the drawing medium’s directness of contact, the weight of my hand against the paper, with the lightness or darkness of the line dependent on the pressure that altogether afforded me a means to communicate – perhaps even insist on – how important the subject is to me.

You focus on landscape drawing (including drawing installations), especially of remote places like deserts, seas, mountain ranges, and forests. You say that you see them as “the other” to our human world. Can you elaborate on that idea and reflect on what fascinates you about these places?

The idea of the natural world as “other” is something I learned from a 2007 lecture by philosopher Manuel de Landa, delivered at the European Graduate School. It was a lecture on the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. The part that impressed me the most was Deleuze’s notion of expressivity in “A Thousand Plateaus,” which, according to de Landa, is not exclusive to humans, so he called it non-human expressivity. Using as examples the colors possessed by plants and animals, and the slow geologic shifts and movements of landforms such as mountains, de Landa elaborated on the idea that nature possesses ways of expressing itself through color, marks, shape, and movement just as humans utilize our voices, marks, and movements for expressions. This idea that the natural world is our “other,” that we share similar abilities with it, collapses any hierarchies between what is human and what is not. I find that it is an argument for all things belonging to nature – from the most common animal life, plant, rocks, and other inanimate things – and being as equally important as human life.

Populus, 60″ x 110″, charcoal and pastel on paper, 2018. Photo courtesy of West Gallery.

How do you think your experience of migrating from coastal environments that have undergone dramatic change impact your work?

When I left Davao City as a teenager of fifteen, it meant also leaving the tropical surroundings that formed my values and ideas when it came to notions of home, play, place, and especially freedom. It wasn’t until another fifteen years later that I saw Davao City again. In those years when I was away from my native city, I lived in dense urbanized cities: first, in Metro Manila, then to metropolitan New York City, and then Jersey City and Montclair in New Jersey.

I attended college in the Philippines and the United States. Through the distance and my education, I gained new perspectives on my native city that developed during the long absence. That time away was an opportunity to learn about the precious ecological diversity of my native island home and how much of it is under threat because of increasing urbanization and deforestation. Unfortunately, being away kept me from witnessing the dramatic changes that Davao was undergoing. When I finally visited it again, I saw that the beach we spent our childhood on was now heavily urbanized, with many parts of the black sand built over with concrete to accommodate restaurants and other establishments. I am still grappling with the rate of change and continued urban developments taking place there and in the rest of the Philippines. I’m thankful some organizations are aware of this and make it their mission to preserve what is left of the precious natural resources there. It is my hope to work with one of them someday.

You are using paper with dimensions of either 5 x 8 feet or 5 x 8 inches. What does scale mean to you and why these specific dimensions?

These extremes in size and scale is a drawing method that I started using only recently. Making work about landscape, my personal memories of it, the fleeting nature of memory, ecological concerns about the vanishing wildernesses, and environmental health, I find there is something vast, boundless, and expansive about these subjects. But at the same time, there’s a great sense of fragility, impermanence, and vulnerability tied to them. I’ve been working with these subjects for over a decade now, and earlier in my art practice, my medium had been both drawing and painting in sizes what I would call medium-sized: from 8 × 10 inches up to 24 x 30 inches.

But after graduate school, and the more I was engaged with my subjects through specific research, travel, and even artists residencies, the more I was feeling a sense of awe, care, and urgency. I was getting interested in wilderness conservation. I felt my work needed another way to communicate the weight of what I felt about those subjects. I found that making very large drawings allowed me to convey them. Through the large 5 × 8-foot drawings, I want to communicate the qualities of vastness, wonder, awe, and uncertainty; through the small 5 × 8-inch drawings, I want to communicate fragility, tenderness, and emotional attachment. As for the specific size choices, it’s pretty much a random choice: they are standard drawing paper sizes that are easily available in art stores.

Terra Macnoliceae, 60″ x 102″, charcoal and pastel on paper, 2020.
Hawak/Hold (Davao Gulf), 6.5″ x 9.5″, graphite on paper, 2019.

Let’s take a close look at your large seascape drawing in the group show â€œPersonal Landscape” at the Montclair Art Museum. How did you start it and what was your process?

This drawing is part of a larger project that comprises this large drawing, small palm-sized drawings, and videos based on the drawings. The project is about the Pacific Ocean: its health as a precious ecosystem, but especially how the ocean is this vast space that lies between my two daughters who each live in countries on the opposite ends of the Pacific. The project started with a large drawing (see below). I wanted the size and scale of it to convey to the viewer the sense of depth and vastness of the subject: the vastness of the ocean, as well as what I felt about the physical distance between my children. To make this large drawing, I counted on photos I took of the ocean in Santa Barbara, California where my younger daughter lives, and the seas in Davao City. I created a composite image based on these multiple photos, and I made the drawing from this composite.

Hawak/Hold (8.7832-124.5085), 60″ x 102“, charcoal and pastel on paper, 2019. Currently installed at the Montclair Art Museum as part of the “Personal Landscapes” group exhibition.

You are having an upcoming solo show at the Visual Art Center of New Jersey. What can you tell me about the body of work you are preparing for that show?

For that show, I’m working on drawings that are about visual analogies between patterns in bark, water, and landforms. I’m still deciding whether the show will consist solely of large drawings or if it will be a mix of those along with small drawings, photographs, video, and even sculpture. I’m envisioning all the works in the project will be unified by an overall grisaille color that will make the drawings appear hazy, in relief, and looking like craggy landscapes.

On a more personal level, I am deciding on this grey tone because it most resembles the black sand of the beaches in Davao City. With the pandemic still having no certain end in sight, it is uncertain when I’ll be able to visit my native city again. Making the large drawings for this project is my way of being there, with each grey mark or stroke of charcoal or pastel becoming a form walking on that dark landscape of black sand and dark sea, as if I am there again and closing the distance between this remembered place and myself.

(Top image: Salix, 60″ x 92″, charcoal and pastel on paper, 2017. Photo courtesy of West Gallery. All photos courtesy of the artist unless otherwise indicated.)

This interview is part of a content collaboration between Art Spiel and Artists & Climate Change. It was originally published on Art Spiel on November 2, 2020 as part of an ongoing interview series with contemporary artists.

______________________________

Etty Yaniv works on her art, art writing, and curatorial projects in Brooklyn. She has exhibited her immersive installations in museums and galleries, nationally and internationally. Yaniv founded the platform Art Spiel to highlight the work of contemporary artists through art reviews, studio visits, and interviews with artists, curators, and gallerists. Yaniv holds a BA in Psychology and English Literature from Tel Aviv University, a BFA from Parsons School of Design, and an MFA from SUNY Purchase.

———-

Artists and Climate Change is a blog that tracks artistic responses from all disciplines to the problem of climate change. It is both a study about what is being done, and a resource for anyone interested in the subject. Art has the power to reframe the conversation about our environmental crisis so it is inclusive, constructive, and conducive to action. Art can, and should, shape our values and behavior so we are better equipped to face the formidable challenge in front of us.

Go to the Artists and Climate Change Blog

Powered by WPeMatico

Climate Change Theatre Action 2021

By Peterson Toscano

Chantal Bilodeau tells us about Climate Change Theatre Action (CCTA) 2021. Founded in 2015, CCTA is a worldwide series of readings and performances of short climate change plays presented biennially to coincide with the United Nations Climate Change Conferences.

CCTA was originally founded by Elaine Ávila, Chantal Bilodeau, Roberta Levitow, and Caridad Svich following a model pioneered by NoPassport Theatre Alliance. It has since evolved into a U.S.-Canada collaboration between The Arctic Cycle and the Centre for Sustainable Practice in the Arts.

Chantal is a playwright and translator originally from Tiohtiá:ke/Montreal, but now based in New York City, the traditional land of the Lenape People. In her capacity as artistic director of The Arctic Cycle, she has been instrumental in getting the theatre and academic communities, as well as audiences in the U.S. and abroad, to engage in climate action through programming that includes live events, talks, publications, workshops, national and international convenings, and a worldwide distributed theatre festival.

To tell us about one of the plays is Dr. Zoë Svendsen, Lecturer in Drama and Performance in the Faculty of English, University of Cambridge. Dr. Svendsen’s play comes out of a larger project called “Love Letter to a Livable Planet.” Through collaboration with members of METIS Arts, Zoe created a short play called Love Out of Ruins, where we get to decide many of the details.

Think of it as a much more sophisticated version of Mad-Libs with the aim to create a vision of the future worth pursuing. The play begins in the present time and moves forward. You get to decide the details that shape the character’s world.

You can read Love Out of Ruins at one of your CCL events. In fact, having a group of friends, students, or climate advocates sit and each fill in the lines can be a mind and heart expanding activity. Then you can share the results at a Climate Change Theatre Action event you host and read some of the plays by the 49 other playwrights from around the world.

For additional material, see:

To learn more about how you can get your hands on these plays and host your own event, visit http://www.climatechangetheatreaction.com/join-us/.

Next month: Learn about Claude Schryer’s The conscient podcast / balado conscient. As a sound designer, Claude is able to reach deep into a listener’s mind and even our body.

If you like what you hear, you can listen to full episodes of Citizens’ Climate Radio on iTunesStitcher Radio, Spotify, SoundCloudPodbeanNorthern Spirit RadioGoogle PlayPlayerFM, and TuneIn Radio. Also, feel free to connect with other listeners, suggest program ideas, and respond to programs in the Citizens’ Climate Radio Facebook group or on Twitter at @CitizensCRadio.

(Top image: Dispatch to the Future: A Theatrical Journey Through Central Park, CCTA’s kick-off event in New York City in September 2021. Photo by Yadin Goldman.)

This article is part of The Art House series.

______________________________

As host of Citizens’ Climate Radio, Peterson Toscano regularly features artists who address climate change in their work. The Art House section of his program includes singer/songwriters, visual artists, comics, creative writers, and playwrights. Through a collaboration with Artists and Climate Change and Citizens’ Climate Education, each month Peterson reissues The Art House for this blog. If you have an idea for The Art House, contact Peterson: radio @ citizensclimatelobby.org

———-

Artists and Climate Change is a blog that tracks artistic responses from all disciplines to the problem of climate change. It is both a study about what is being done, and a resource for anyone interested in the subject. Art has the power to reframe the conversation about our environmental crisis so it is inclusive, constructive, and conducive to action. Art can, and should, shape our values and behavior so we are better equipped to face the formidable challenge in front of us.

Go to the Artists and Climate Change Blog

Powered by WPeMatico

Divided We Fall: Reflections on Linguistic Conflict in Giancarlo Abrahan’s Play ‘Whistler’

By Camille Cuzzupoli

Language is a gift.

We don’t often think about what a marvel it is that someone can say “I feel hungry” and another person can understand their exact set of emotions based only on that tiny combination of words. Language is one of the most important mechanisms in fostering understanding between humans. By articulating how we feel, listening, comprehending, and responding in kind, we are able to collaborate and work together towards solutions for ourselves, our neighbors, and our world.

However, this isn’t how language tends to be understood in today’s culture, nor is this always how it is used. Language – the thing meant to bind people together – is often used to divide them. This is a problem that regularly manifests in political campaigns with popular slogans. “Defund the police” is a phrase meant to communicate the need to divert funds away from law enforcement and into more holistic alternatives and underfunded areas like education and the arts. But this isn’t what detractors hear. They misinterpret the slogan as taking away all money from the police force and letting crime on the street run rampant. Part of the reason this misinterpretation happens is because of the language we use. In order to engage in open dialogue with those who disagree with us, we need to cultivate arguments and rhetoric that they haven’t heard or already argued against. Active thinking and engagement is forcefully initiated.

Photo by Erick Zajac on Unsplash

I myself have struggled to feel understood my whole life. Whenever I have attempted to explain my emotions, opinions, or outlooks, it has always felt like nobody truly comprehended me. As an adult, I cope with this struggle by taking part in the aforementioned cultivation. I use very specific words and try to explain things in such a way that the other party can both digest and respond to what I am expressing. When it works, there is no greater feeling. When it doesn’t, it feels like the only thing left to do is to give up. But when it comes to talking about climate change, giving up isn’t an option. The climate crisis is the greatest existential threat humanity has ever faced; it is something we all have to agree on, and something we all have to be prepared to fight. 

Giancarlo Abrahan’s short play Whistler understands this all too well.

Whistler is about an island community suffering from the rise of automation and the depletion of resources, and the inevitability of having to leave everything behind to make way for the new. The play was written for Climate Change Theatre Action 2021 (CCTA), a worldwide series of readings and performances of 5-minute plays about the climate crisis, presented this fall to coincide with the United Nations Climate Conference in Glasgow. The prompt given to the playwrights was  “Envisioning a Global Green New Deal.” According to the CCTA website, “we encouraged [playwrights] to show us what their dream future looks like – and how we might get there.” Hailing from the Philippines, Abrahan wrote about human displacement as a consequence of environmental protection measures, the grief inherent in said displacement, and the struggles of making one’s voice heard to those who can’t or won’t listen.

Abrahan deserves massive props for his poetic sensibilities. The experience of reading a play can often feel incomplete, because plays aren’t meant to be read; they are meant to be experienced in performance. Without the visual and audial elements, a play often can’t have its full intended impact. Whistler is not one of those plays. It sits firmly between poetry and drama, and with its phrasing and expressions, creates a reading experience that speaks deeply to personal experience. One of the most potent passages is the Boy’s discussion of his island community,  and the rise of automation and its consequences:

BOY: The real trade, though, was squeezing milk out of our mountains. Like they were breasts. Calcium was very important then. It might still be today, depending on which doctors you ask. Except the world developed lactose intolerance. So we had to look for calcium elsewhere, and forget certain flowers. Heads had to learn to wear new hats, arms had to acclimatize to sleeves.

A siren wails. In new positions on the stage; the MEN and the BOY sit on their chairs.

Anyway, our mountains had been flat-chested for a while. And so we were given…

A WOMAN enters and gives envelopes to the MEN and the BOY.

WOMAN: A green new deal.

The MEN and the BOY open the envelopes.
On sheets of paper – transcriptions of their misinterpretations. (Abrahan 2)

Misinterpretation is a constant throughout the text of Whistler. When a Green New Deal finally comes, it is not understood as such. “Green new deal” is misinterpreted as “a grey nude eel,” “agreein’ you’d hell,” “agri, no deal,” and so on. It is necessary to the community, but it cannot be properly understood, and therefore cannot be properly utilized. Poignantly, the people who live on this island are often only one letter short of being on the same page. Take, for instance, the exchange between Woman and Boy:

WOMAN: You smell that? Oh, fresh air!

BOY: (Whistles) You mean, sweat air?

WOMAN: I did mean fresh.

BOY: But the sweat air, that’s me. (Whistles) Not just fresh. That’s me!

WOMAN: Well… (Sniffs) You neither look sweaty nor smell sour to me.

BOY: No, no, no…I meant SWEET air. (Whistles) That’s me.

WOMAN: Sweet and fresh, I didn’t know there was a difference. (3)

Whistler’s exploration of the consequences incurred from tiny misunderstandings is disturbingly reflective of patterns we see in society every day. Right-wing conservatives hear “Green New Deal” and interpret that as “the liberals want to take away your burgers,” and they parrot that interpretation so often that it overshadows the actual contents and intentions of the Green New Deal. It’s similar to a game of telephone; whatever the outcome is, it’s nothing like the original message. Scientists and activists are very specific with the language they use to discuss what climate change is, the kind of impact that it has, and the actions needed to fight it. The recently released IPCC Report is a perfect example of this; when the United Nations Chief describes the report as a “code red for humanity,” it’s nigh impossible to understand that as anything but a desperate, urgent warning. And yet, Twitter has already started to see detractors claim this plea is just liberal fear mongering – that scientists are exaggerating. For what purpose? Even they don’t seem to know.

So… how do we move forward? If we can’t communicate effectively, what’s left for us besides the end of the world? Is it too late after all?

No. It’s never too late.

If we can’t communicate effectively, we have to change our rhetoric. Instead of saying “end fast fashion,” we can say “improving working conditions in the clothing industry will lead to products being better and less waste being produced.” Instead of saying “climate change has caused displacement,” we can say “heads had to learn to wear new hats.” We can find a different point of view. Forge a new path. Choose a different tactic. Those who are against a climate revolution want us to succumb to climate grief. They want us to give up when we say “sweat” and someone else hears “sweet.” They want nihilism to bind our hands so that we can’t put them to work. They want to pollute our hope, because without hope, we have nothing.

We don’t have to let them do that.

(Top image: Siargao Island, Philippines. Photo by Beth Macdonald on Unsplash.)

______________________________

Camille Cuzzupoli is a rising senior at Bennington College and summer intern for Climate Change Theatre Action. She studies dramaturgy, theatre history, and costume design, and has worked as a Field Work Term intern for HowlRound Theatre Commons and Actors’ Shakespeare project. As an artist, she seeks to encourage critical thinking, personal transformation, and social equity through the theatrical medium. Her work has been published on howlround.com and medium.com.

———-

Artists and Climate Change is a blog that tracks artistic responses from all disciplines to the problem of climate change. It is both a study about what is being done, and a resource for anyone interested in the subject. Art has the power to reframe the conversation about our environmental crisis so it is inclusive, constructive, and conducive to action. Art can, and should, shape our values and behavior so we are better equipped to face the formidable challenge in front of us.

Go to the Artists and Climate Change Blog

Powered by WPeMatico

An Interview with Author Alexandra Kleeman

By Amy Brady

This month, I have for you an interview with an author who’s been involved on the climate front in numerous ways. Alexandra Kleeman (You Too Can Have a Body Like Mine), an Assistant Professor at the New School, has worked with Writers Rebel NYC and the Brooklyn Public Library’s Climate Reads series. Her latest novel, Something New Under the Sun, tells a richly layered story about multiple crises: climate change, corporate greed, and the widespread dissemination of misinformation. We discussed what draws her to these subjects, why she chose to set her latest novel in Hollywood, and how she’s witnessed the climate crisis manifest in her own life.

Something New Under the Sun touches on several ecological crises. I know that you’re also involved with other climate-related projects, such as Writers Rebel and the Brooklyn Public Library’s Climate Reads series. What draws you to these issues and why do you seek to explore them in your writing?

I moved around a lot as a kid, and the outdoors became a place of stability and security for me – not because these environments were all the same, but because common plants and animals showed up in each, like friends I recognized. I also had the experience, in every place I lived, of watching someplace I cared about get destroyed, a place that looked to developers like an unutilized piece of land but that contained little marshes and special trees that I had named and loved. When I saw what they put in the place of those woods or fields that I knew as particular, special entities, it always seemed to be an imitation of something else we already had, another blocky strip mall or vinyl-sided house. It gave rise to an intense fascination and ambivalence about the things that humans built, so durable and resistant to change in some ways, but also so fragile, unable to sustain themselves without a continual influx of energy, money, and natural resources. That feeling has fed a lot of my writing, which often examines the man-made and the processed as alien, denaturalized things – like the surreal, existential snack cakes in my first novel, You Too Can Have A Body Like Mine. But the climate-related changes that I’ve seen over the last decade, from rising sea levels and flooding close to my home in Staten Island to the record-breaking wildfires that have scoured my hometown, have driven home the fact that the consequences of warming are already arriving, the emergency moment is now. 

To me, literature has an ethical obligation to help incorporate these cataclysmic shifts in our environment into our daily understanding of reality, to connect the precarity of those already experiencing drastic upheaval as a result of climate volatility to the lives of those who remain relatively untouched as a result of their privilege and geographical location, to describe the affects associated with climate grief, precarity, and ecological mourning and make them more concrete and palpable, to make them something than can be discussed more easily and more often. What does it mean to live alongside catastrophe and continue on living “life as we know it”? How can we metabolize the information we are given about climate change, how can we become less insulated, in mind and behavior, from the climate catastrophe that is already arriving? Literature doesn’t create direct change, but I do believe it can help us think through the impasses that keep us from organizing and taking action.

Purchase your copy of Something New Under the Sun here.

As you mentioned, you’re currently living on Staten Island. Why did you set your novel in Hollywood? Might it have anything to do with the extraordinary wildfires and droughts we’ve witnessed out West the last few years?

I knew that I wanted to set my novel in the West, in the sort of landscapes that I grew up in and feel a strong connection to – landscapes that were always troubled by drought and are increasingly going up in flames. But Hollywood was an especially compelling Western location because of the way it sits at the intersection of the constructed and the natural: surrounded by chaparral and desert and habitat still wild enough to support handfuls of mountain lions, but also home to a film industry based around pouring massive amounts of energy and craft into making these projects that seem to just unfold effortlessly before the eyes of the audience. The resources and apparatus that conjure these stories seem to vanish into thin air, and then the experience of watching a film and becoming absorbed in it feels almost immaterial, ghostly. It seems like a fitting metaphor for many other things in our American lifestyle – the way the massive amounts of water, oil, fertilizer, and labor that go into a carton of almond milk become invisible within the bright-lit aisles of the grocery store. Los Angeles is fascinating to me, because it represents at once its own unique materiality and the dream of becoming immaterial, changeable, infinitely plastic.

Your novel explores corporate corruption – and its relation to environmental degradation – through a wonderfully unique story. What inspired this part of your novel? Anything in real life?

There are so many instances of corporate corruption and destructive, short-sighted action right out in the open – the work of the gas and oil industry to suppress information about climate change and alternative energy technologies, the suppression of information about the harmful effects of PFOAs by DuPont chemical. In general, there’s a substitutive logic at work in this country that has unintended and harmful consequences – maybe the most important case study for me when writing this book was what we saw happening in Flint, Michigan, when the local government switched the city’s water source during a budget crisis. The new water hadn’t been treated with corrosion inhibitors, and lead began leaching from the old pipework into the drinking water supply, exposing the city’s majority Black population to high levels of lead over many years. Residents noticed a difference in the color and taste of the water and lodged many complaints which were ignored by the local government. There’s a tendency to think “Water is water” (or “wood is wood,” etc) erasing the specificity of a material’s origin and history and composition. But how these resources are obtained, how they interact with their new context matters: Substitution has unforeseen consequences; it’s never a simple one-to-one swap.

Your book also explores the rise of “alternative facts” and misinformation – a problem we’ve long seen in the realm of climate communication and amplified further in the era of COVID. What is it about this problem that interests you? Were there any case studies that particularly fascinated you while writing this book? 

I’m fascinated by the world of misinformation and disinformation – not as much from the perspective of those working to sow confusion in a self-interested and cynical way, but from the perspective of those eager to believe it. I think there’s a powerful emotional impulse underlying the preference for an “alternative interpretation” of reality, and it can be understood and empathized with insofar as those of us who truly believe in the actuality of the climate crisis also experience the extreme tension caused by the idea that a world that feels stable and consistent on a day-to-day basis is in fact under threat and in the process of transforming into something that will feel alien. It causes even those who take climate change seriously to experience the desire to avoid thinking about or acknowledging the crisis at times, to avoid talking about it with others in order to preserve social harmony, to plan as though the conditions of life now will be the conditions of life twenty years from now. You could also say that, even though many of us (and presumably everybody reading this) believe that climate change is real, we do not necessarily behave in our daily lives like people who believe that the actions we take in the present make the crucial difference in how much the world will warm in our future. It is very difficult, psychologically and logistically, to divest yourself from a vision of the world that you feel relatively adapted to – and embracing alternative facts is a way of resolving that psychological strain.

To the extent that you feel comfortable, would you share how climate change and/or other environmental problems have manifested in your own life? 

I live on the North Shore of Staten Island, close to the ferry and directly adjacent to a waterfront that was wrecked in Hurricane Irene, two years before Sandy. The fenced-off waterfront, overgrown with weeds but also populated by an apple tree and a rosebush and a few other remnants of the landscaped thing it used to be, is a daily reminder of its vulnerability to the sort of disasters that are certain to happen more often in the coming years. Along my walk to work is a section of the walkway that is literally falling into the harbor, and after storms or during higher tides the water comes up over the wreckage and sloshes onto the path. Also, the walk I usually take to work has been obsolete for several months, after a sinkhole opened up in the walkway and the whole area was fenced off – I still feel the impulse to walk that same route, and a sense of loss and uncertainty when I realize that I can’t. We see the signs of rising sea level and increasingly unstable ground and know that our time here is finite. At the same time, my home state of Colorado, a place I always thought I’d like to retire to someday, is burning each summer with record-setting fires that make the air so smoky it can seem on some days like the Rockies have vanished. I feel homesick all the time, whether I’m in New York or Colorado, and ultimately I think I’m most homesick for another time, a time of small, predictable changes, a time when disaster wasn’t woven into the fabric of daily life.

This is a funny question for someone whose book is only just hitting shelves, but what’s next for you? Anything you’d like my readers to watch for?

My next project is a novel spanning many different time periods and set on different islands. I’m fascinated by islands – my mother is from an island nation, and islands have served as a symbol for so many fantasies of how life and community might be reconfigured to allow for a better life, as well as the literal terrain for enacting these experiments. After so many dystopias, I’m excited to finally write something bordering on utopian – though I’m sure in my hands the term will look a little different and darker than what might be expected.

(Top image: Photo by Fred Tangerman/Djerassi.)

This article is part of the Climate Art Interviews series. It was originally published in Amy Brady’s “Burning Worlds” newsletter. Subscribe to get Amy’s newsletter delivered straight to your inbox.

___________________________

Amy Brady is the Deputy Publisher of Guernica magazine and Senior Editor of the Chicago Review of Books. Her writing about art, culture, and climate has appeared in the Village Voice, the Los Angeles Times, Pacific Standard, the New Republic, and other places. She is also the editor of the monthly newsletter “Burning Worlds,” which explores how artists and writers are thinking about climate change. She holds a PHD in English and is the recipient of a CLIR/Mellon Library of Congress Fellowship. Read more of her work at AmyBradyWrites.com at and follow her on Twitter at @ingredient_x.

———-

Artists and Climate Change is a blog that tracks artistic responses from all disciplines to the problem of climate change. It is both a study about what is being done, and a resource for anyone interested in the subject. Art has the power to reframe the conversation about our environmental crisis so it is inclusive, constructive, and conducive to action. Art can, and should, shape our values and behavior so we are better equipped to face the formidable challenge in front of us.

Go to the Artists and Climate Change Blog

Powered by WPeMatico

Not My Leader

By Joan Sullivan

What kind of “leader” would – on the very same day that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released its most dire climate assessment to date – obfuscate (once again) his government’s purchase of a controversial oil pipeline expansion as a way to generate revenue to “achieve its long-term climate objectives?”

What kind of “leader” would – the day after the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report paints the starkest picture yet of the accelerating danger caused by human use of coal, oil and gas â€“ urge OPEC and its allies to increase oil production? 

What kind of “leader” would – in the same week that the IPCC made it crystal clear that climate change is now “affecting every inhabited region across the globe” – announce a nearly $4 billion investment in coal?

What kind of “leader” would – a week after the IPCC’s ominous report – approve a new gas drilling project beneath a national park?

In the context of the climate emergency, none of these politicians deserves the title “leader.” Leaders are supposed to lead. But these so-called “leaders” are nothing more than handmaidens beholden to the fossil fuel industry. 

Let’s throw out the faux honorifics and refer to these politicians as nothing more than “elected officials,” a description that underscores the temporary nature of their present jobs. Because they could quickly become un-elected in the next election cycle when we, the voters – especially young voters â€“ replace them with people who have the courage to speak to truth, who are not tethered to the fossil fuel industry. People whose words and actions embody the possibility of near-term social collapse.

I am full of rage this week. Rage at the shameful and tone-deaf responses of our elected officials to the IPCC’s urgent call for “rapid and unprecedented societal transformation.” Rage at “our apparent inability to stop ourselves from destroying our only habitat.” Rage at our collective suicide, according to the Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Žižek:

Rage at the indifference – there’s no other word for it – of close friends, family, and neighbors who carry on with their fossil fueled, fast fashion, frequent flyer lifestyles as if July 2021 was not the hottest. month. ever. recorded. in. human. history.

“The worst is yet to come,” according to the IPCC, “affecting our children’s and grandchildren’s lives much more than our own.” The looming collapse of the Gulf Streamis one of the tipping points that worries me most: scientists admit that it “must not be allowed to happen.” It would have catastrophic consequences for all species across the globe, not just for humans.

In a leaked version of the draft IPCC report earlier this year, one sentence jumped out of the nearly 4,000 pages and went viral: “Life on Earth can recover from a drastic climate shift by evolving into new species and creating new ecosystems; humans cannot.” 

How could anyone be indifferent to that?

A recent Instagram post by Danish artist Olafur Eliasson suggests why:

It’s fair to say that [the science is] often very disembodied. It is knowledge that doesn’t have a physical sort of storage; there’s no memory of it in our bodies.

Olafur Eliasson

Embodiment: is this the secret sauce that’s been missing in the artistic community’s response to the climate crisis to date?

Over the coming months, I’d like to explore this concept of embodiment for future posts, especially as it relates to the energy transition. I welcome comments from any artists, architects and/or scribes (in the space below) describing how they are, in Eliasson’s words, bringing “an experiential narrative” to their artistic interpretations of the energy transition. I will contact each of you separately and hopefully will feature your work in future posts in the Renewable Energy series of Artists and Climate Change.

Artists, it’s time to lead. Energy is at the heart of the climate emergency, and a transition away from fossil fuels must be at the heart of its solution. As Ursula Le Guin observed, “Resistance and change often begin in art.”

For those who have not had time to read the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report 2021, Working Group 1: The Physical Science Basis, here’s a two-minute video summary:

(Top image: Partial cover of the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report, Working Group 1: The Physical Science Basis, 2021.)

This article is part of the Renewable Energy series.

______________________________

Joan Sullivan is a Canadian photographer focused on the energy transition. In her monthly column for Artists and Climate Change, Joan explores the intersection of art and the energy transition. She is currently experimenting with abstract photography as a new language to express her grief about climate breakdown. You can find Joan on Twitter and Visura.

———-

Artists and Climate Change is a blog that tracks artistic responses from all disciplines to the problem of climate change. It is both a study about what is being done, and a resource for anyone interested in the subject. Art has the power to reframe the conversation about our environmental crisis so it is inclusive, constructive, and conducive to action. Art can, and should, shape our values and behavior so we are better equipped to face the formidable challenge in front of us.

Go to the Artists and Climate Change Blog

Powered by WPeMatico